Discussion about this post

User's avatar
AI Creator House's avatar

I am one of the few AI filmmakers that have created not one - but TWO - feature length AI-powered films. (I am also well into the creation of a massive Magnum Opus, developing a sci-fi world and story every bit as rich and complex as The Lord of The Rings).

I spend a LOT of time watching other people's AI-powered films, and I can tell you that I have seen more artistry and creativity in an average AI-powered film fest than I have in the last 50 years out of Hollywood.

Yes, new studios are being formed - I run AI Creator House, as well as a large guild of other creative, active, accomplished AI filmmakers, and our guild will soon be joining other guilds, with recognition and any income being divided fairly among the contributors.

Judging studios by funding is ridiculous. Hollywood is dying because their movies are made for the sole purpose of making money, and when a studio makes films for the sole purpose of making money, they are already irrelevant.

Here's my latest AI-powered feature film, and winner of Best Science and Technology film at the Cannes World Film Awards, Nobody Believes Cassandra:

https://youtu.be/2sw4TFGbv0w

The $600 million movie is dead. Long live the $600 film.

Expand full comment
Josh Wolf's avatar

It seems like when it comes to web-based short and medium length content AI studios will quickly dominate. The same is true of the advertising realm.

But when it comes to the world of Hollywood — I think the obvious low-hanging fruit is in the realm of taking over some of the work done by effects houses for far cheaper.

This is the area that Hollywood has consistently outsourced to specialized companies for decades and is consistently focused on producing quality product at a cheaper price.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts